Qualcomm Reaches $75 Million Settlement Over Sales And Licensing Practices By Reuters | Old North State Wealth News
Connect with us

Investing

Qualcomm reaches $75 million settlement over sales and licensing practices By Reuters

Published

on

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) – Qualcomm (NASDAQ:) agreed to pay $75 million to resolve a lawsuit in which shareholders accused the chipmaker of defrauding them by hiding its anticompetitive sales and licensing practices.

A preliminary all-cash settlement was filed on Tuesday with the federal court in San Diego.

It requires approval by U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta, who certified the lawsuit as a class action in March 2023.

Qualcomm and six individual defendants, including former chief executives Paul Jacobs and Steven Mollenkopf, denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

The San Diego-based company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Shareholders accused Qualcomm of artificially inflating its share price between February 2012 and January 2017 by repeatedly describing its chip sales and technology licensing as separate businesses, when in fact Qualcomm bundled them to stifle competition.

In January 2017, the Federal Trade Commission and Apple (NASDAQ:) sued Qualcomm separately in connection with its alleged efforts to monopolize the market for baseband processors, a type of chip used in cellphones.

Apple said Qualcomm used its monopoly position to overcharge for chips, and seek onerous and costly terms for technology licenses.

Qualcomm called the claims baseless, but its share price fell 13% on the first full trading day after Apple sued.

The case is In re Qualcomm Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, No. 17-00121.



Read the full article here

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2022 ONSWM News. Content posted on the Old North State Wealth News page was developed and produced by a third party news aggregation service. Old North State Wealth Management is not affiliated with the news aggregation service. The information presented is believed to be current. It should not be viewed as personalized investment advice. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors on the date the articles were published. The information presented is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell, any of the securities discussed.